Escape from Bondage: Why Stocks Beat Bonds Every Time

Book: Beating the Street by Peter Lynch with John Rothchild | ISBN: 978-0-671-75915-5

Lynch opens the Introduction of Beating the Street like a preacher returning to the pulpit. He has one message, and he’s not being subtle about it. Buy stocks.

He’d already made this case in his first book, One Up on Wall Street. But people clearly didn’t listen. So he’s back, with the same sermon and bigger numbers to back it up.

The Number That Should End Every Argument

Lynch pulls data from the Ibbotson SBBI Yearbook covering 64 years of returns from 1926 to 1989. Here’s what $100,000 would have become in each category:

• Long-term government bonds: $1.6 million
• S&P 500 stocks: $25.5 million

That’s not a typo. Stocks turned $100,000 into more than 15 times what bonds produced. Over the same time period. With the same starting amount.

And it’s not like bonds beat stocks half the time. Looking at returns decade by decade, stocks outperformed bonds in six out of seven decades. The only decade bonds won was the 1930s, during the Great Depression. The 1970s were basically a tie.

So the odds of stocks beating bonds in any given decade? About six to one.

But here’s the real kicker. Even in the rare decade when bonds come out ahead, the margin is small. The decades when stocks win? The gap is enormous. The 1940s and 1960s saw stock returns that bonds couldn’t come close to matching. Over the long haul, bond investors can never make up the difference.

Peter’s Principle #2: Gentlemen who prefer bonds don’t know what they’re missing.

A Nation of Bondholders

You’d think with numbers this clear, everyone would be all in on stocks. But Lynch was frustrated to find the opposite.

During the 1980s, which was the second-best decade for stocks in modern history, the percentage of household money invested in stocks actually went down. In the 1960s, nearly 40 percent of household assets were in stocks. By 1980, it dropped to 25 percent. By 1990, just 17 percent.

The stock market quadrupled in value during the ’80s, and people were pulling money out.

Even in equity mutual funds, the allocation dropped from 70 percent in 1980 to 43 percent in 1990. Lynch discovered that at his own firm, Fidelity, thousands of retirement account holders had most of their money in money-market funds and bond funds instead of equities. And retirement accounts are the perfect place for stocks because the money can sit and grow for 10 to 30 years.

Ninety percent of the nation’s investment dollars were parked in bonds, CDs, and money-market accounts. Ninety percent. In spots that historically return less than half what stocks do.

Lynch puts it bluntly: “Buy stocks! If this is the only lesson you learn from this book, then writing it will have been worth the trouble.”

Why People Avoid Stocks Anyway

So if the data is this one-sided, why do people stick with bonds? Lynch doesn’t dodge this question.

Part of it is the cultural memory of the 1929 Crash. Sixty years later, that one event was still scaring people away from stocks. Even people who weren’t born yet when it happened. The Crash got linked with the Depression in our collective memory, so now people assume every big stock drop means economic collapse.

But the 1972 crash was almost as bad as 1929. Taco Bell went from $15 to $1. And it didn’t lead to a depression. The 1987 correction didn’t either. Stock crashes and economic collapses are not the same thing, but our brains keep connecting them.

The other part is simply fear. Bonds feel safe. You get your interest payments. Nothing exciting happens, but nothing terrible happens either. Stocks go up and down, and those downs can feel brutal even when the long-term math is overwhelmingly positive.

Lynch gets it. But he also thinks staying in bonds because you’re afraid of stocks is like refusing to leave your house because you might get rained on. You’re technically safer. But you’re missing everything.

What the Book Covers From Here

After making his case for stocks, Lynch lays out the road map for the rest of the book.

Chapters 1 and 2 cover how amateur investors and investment clubs have beaten the pros, and why expert market predictions are worthless.

Chapter 3 is his strategy for picking mutual funds, something he was reluctant to write about while he was still managing one.

Chapters 4, 5, and 6 look back at his 13 years running Magellan through 9 major corrections. He goes back through his records to figure out what actually worked and what didn’t.

Chapters 7 through 20 are the heart of the book. Lynch walks through 21 stocks he recommended to Barron’s magazine, covering banks, S&Ls, retailers, utilities, and cyclical companies. He shows his research process in detail. Not theory. Actual picks with actual notes.

Chapter 21 covers the six-month checkup, where you review the story behind each stock in your portfolio to see if it still holds up.

Lynch warns you upfront: he has no magic formulas. No bells ring when you’ve bought the right stock. But if you understand what makes companies in different industries profitable or unprofitable, you can improve your odds. That’s the whole game.

And throughout it all, he sprinkles in what he calls “Peter’s Principles.” Lessons learned from experience. He notes that experience is always an expensive teacher, so you’re getting them at a discount.

Previous: Why Peter Lynch Left the Best Job on Wall Street

Next: When Seventh Graders Beat Wall Street: The St. Agnes Miracle