Phase Four: Congress Hears the CRE Alarm Bell

Retelling Chapter 4 (Part 1) of The Commercial Real Estate Tsunami by Tony Wood (foreword by Matthew Anderson, ISBN 978-0-470-63637-4).

Tony Wood opens Chapter 4 with a tsunami metaphor that sticks. The “Run-Up” phase is the wave’s last push inland, when momentum and sudden arrival do the most damage. By 2010, commercial real estate was in that phase. The question was not whether trouble was coming. It was whether anyone in Washington understood how big the wall needed to be.

On July 9, 2009, the Joint Economic Committee held a hearing titled “Commercial Real Estate: Do Rising Defaults Pose a Systemic Threat?” Wood watched it and came away with mixed feelings. Members of Congress were asking real questions, but many seemed to be catching up to a crisis the industry had been describing for months. One question stood out: Is this a systemic problem? The panel answered yes, unanimously. Another followed: What if we do nothing? The answers were grim.

Then came a number that changed the room. Someone asked what share of GDP commercial real estate represents. Jeffrey DeBoer of the Real Estate Roundtable said roughly 13 percent. That figure seemed to shift the conversation from “is this serious?” to “what can we do?”

The hearing that put CRE on the national agenda

Wood includes the full testimony in the book because the statements are that useful. The panel included the Real Estate Roundtable, the National Association of Realtors, Deutsche Bank on CMBS findings, and Jon Greenlee from the Federal Reserve. Each came to warn Congress, not to reassure it.

DeBoer’s message was blunt. America’s credit system did not have the capacity to meet legitimate demand for commercial real estate debt. Transaction volume had fallen nearly 80 percent. Asset values were down about 35 percent on average. Cap rates had widened roughly 250 basis points. Rents had dropped up to 20 percent depending on property type. With few sales happening, price discovery had broken down, which made loan-to-value ratios even harder to manage during refinancing.

The sector itself was enormous: $6.7 trillion in value supported by $3.5 trillion in debt. An estimated 9 million jobs tied to real estate. Pension funds held roughly $160 billion in commercial equity. State and local governments depended on property taxes and transaction fees. Rising defaults were not a niche problem. They were a Main Street problem.

The maturity wall nobody could ignore

DeBoer laid out where the debt lived. Commercial banks held about $1.5 trillion (43 percent). CMBS accounted for roughly $750 billion (22 percent). Life companies held about $315 billion. GSE-related pools added another $330 billion. Most loans had terms of ten years or less, so debt matured constantly.

In 2009 alone, maturing commercial loans were estimated at $300 to $500 billion. Looking ahead, about $400 billion would mature each year for the next decade. Banks and CMBS had supplied roughly 83 percent of recent debt growth. Both channels were effectively shut. CMBS issuance peaked at $230 billion in 2007, fell to $12 billion in 2008, and had reached zero in 2009.

Even performing loans on solid assets in good markets struggled to refinance. REITs had raised some public equity and unsecured debt in 2009, which was a positive sign for the listed segment. But that alone could not solve a liquidity crisis affecting the whole market. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac helped multifamily, and only multifamily.

Five policy asks from the Roundtable

DeBoer closed his opening with five recommendations Congress should act on quickly:

1. Extend TALF beyond its December 31, 2009 sunset through end of 2010
2. Create a federally backed credit facility for new commercial loan originations
3. Encourage foreign capital by amending or repealing FIRPTA
4. Let banks extend performing loans based on cash flow and temporarily ease REMIC rules for CMBS modifications
5. Reject anti-investment tax proposals like carried interest changes and expand NOL carry-back to all businesses

The detailed testimony goes much deeper on TALF limits, PPIP, rating agency reform, the trillion-dollar equity gap, and why tax changes during a crisis would backfire. Wood’s takeaway: good people were working on solutions, but the problems were multifaceted and politically hard. Big fixes like FIRPTA and REMIC reform would face resistance. Smaller players, owner-users, and community lenders still had no clear playbook.

That gap is exactly what Sam Chandan’s chapter addresses next. But first, the rest of the July 9 testimony from NAR and the Fed paints an even sharper picture of what was already breaking in the market.

Series navigation

← Previous: Phase Three Drawdown

→ Next: 2010 Update and Policy Interventions