The Big Short Prologue: Poltergeist - How Michael Lewis Got Back in the Game
Michael Lewis opens The Big Short with a confession. And it is one of the most honest things I have ever read from someone who worked on Wall Street.
He says, basically: I had no idea what I was doing. I was 24 years old. I had no accounting background. I had never run a business. I had never even managed my own savings. And yet Salomon Brothers, one of the biggest investment banks in the world, was paying me hundreds of thousands of dollars to give investment advice to grown adults.
And he is telling you this in the first paragraph.
The Accidental Wall Street Guy
Lewis stumbled into Salomon Brothers in 1985 and stumbled out in 1988, richer than he had any right to be. The whole thing felt absurd to him. Wall Street’s job, in theory, is to allocate capital. To decide who gets money and who doesn’t. And here was this kid from the humanities with zero qualifications making huge bets with other people’s money.
He figured it couldn’t last. Sooner or later, someone would figure out that a bunch of twenty-somethings with no real financial knowledge were running the show. There would be a Great Reckoning. Wall Street would wake up. The frauds would get expelled.
So he wrote it all down. That book became Liar’s Poker.
Here’s the thing. He wrote it like a message in a bottle. A note for future generations. Like, “Hey, you won’t believe this, but this actually happened.” He thought he was writing a period piece about the 1980s, when America temporarily lost its financial mind.
He expected future readers to be shocked that the CEO of Salomon Brothers, John Gutfreund, was paid $3.1 million while running the company into the ground. He expected them to be horrified that a bond trader named Howie Rubin lost $250 million at Merrill Lynch.
And yeah, future readers were shocked. But not in the way Lewis expected.
“How Quaint”
This is the part that really got me.
Lewis says he never imagined that a future reader would look back at his stories and say, “How quaint. How innocent.” But that is exactly what happened.
Because the financial craziness of the 1980s didn’t end. It lasted two more decades. And it got worse. Way worse.
A single bond trader making $47 million a year and feeling cheated about it. The mortgage bond market that was invented on the Salomon Brothers trading floor leading to the worst financial disaster in modern history. Another trader named Howie, this time at Morgan Stanley, losing not $250 million but $9 billion on a single mortgage trade. And nobody outside Morgan Stanley even heard about it.
Let me say that again. Nine billion dollars. On one trade. And it was basically a secret.
When Lewis wrote Liar’s Poker in 1989, the numbers that scandalized people were in the millions. Twenty years later, the same kind of incompetence was measured in billions. The scale had changed, but the stupidity hadn’t.
The Book That Backfired
Now here is the part I find both funny and depressing. Lewis says he hoped his book would discourage smart young people from going to Wall Street. He imagined some bright kid at Ohio State University who really wanted to be an oceanographer would read Liar’s Poker, understand that Wall Street was a circus, turn down the offer from Goldman Sachs, and go study the ocean instead.
That is not what happened.
Six months after the book came out, Lewis was buried in letters from students at Ohio State. But they weren’t asking how to avoid Wall Street. They were asking for more insider tips. They had read his expose of Wall Street excess as a how-to manual.
I come from the Soviet Union. I worked in science. And I can tell you, when smart people see a system that rewards people with no qualifications obscene amounts of money, they don’t think, “That’s wrong.” They think, “How do I get in?”
Lewis tried to warn people. They took notes instead.
Twenty Years of Waiting
So Lewis left Wall Street and waited. He waited for the system to collapse.
And things kept happening that looked like they should have been the end. The scandal that destroyed Drexel Burnham. The scandal that finished off Salomon Brothers. The collapse of Long-Term Capital Management. The Internet bubble.
Over and over, the financial system got caught doing something stupid or corrupt. And over and over, the big banks just kept growing. The bonuses kept getting bigger. Twenty-six-year-olds kept getting paid absurd amounts to do work with no obvious social value.
Lewis has this great line: “Why bother to overturn your parents’ world when you can buy it and sell off the pieces?”
At some point, he gave up. He figured nothing was big enough to take down the system. No scandal. No crash. Nothing.
And then came Meredith Whitney.
The Woman Who Crashed the Market
Whitney was an analyst at Oppenheimer and Co. Nobody had heard of her. She wasn’t famous. She wasn’t powerful. She was, by Wall Street standards, a nobody.
On October 31, 2007, she published a research note saying that Citigroup had so badly mismanaged its business that it would need to either cut its dividend or go bankrupt.
By the end of that single trading day, Citigroup’s stock dropped 8 percent and $390 billion was wiped off the U.S. stock market. Four days later, Citigroup’s CEO resigned. Two weeks after that, Citigroup cut its dividend. Just like she said.
Here’s the problem with what Whitney was saying, and the reason it was so dangerous. She wasn’t accusing Wall Street of being corrupt. Corruption, Wall Street can survive. People on Wall Street have been called crooks since forever. It rolls right off them.
Whitney was saying something much worse. She was saying they were stupid.
These people whose entire job was to manage money didn’t even know how to manage their own firms’ money. The emperor had no clothes, and she was pointing and describing exactly what she saw.
All through 2008, every time the banks said, “We’ve dealt with the problem,” Whitney came back with, “No you haven’t. You still haven’t faced the real losses. You still don’t understand how badly you’ve messed this up.” Her rivals called her overrated. Bloggers said she was lucky. But she kept being right.
And she admitted something important. She was partly guessing. There was no way for her to know exactly how bad things were. The CEOs themselves didn’t know. “Either that or they are all liars,” she said, “but I assume they really just don’t know.”
Think about that. The people running the biggest financial institutions in the world genuinely did not understand what was on their own books. They were flying a plane and had no idea how much fuel was left. Or maybe whether the wings were still attached.
The Trail That Led to This Book
So Lewis called Whitney. This was in early 2008, before Bear Stearns collapsed. He wanted to know if she was the real deal and where she came from.
She told him about her background. She came out of Brown University’s English department in 1994, landed at Oppenheimer, and got trained by a guy named Steve Eisman. “After I made the Citi call,” she told Lewis, “one of the best things that happened was when Steve called and told me how proud he was of me.”
Lewis didn’t think much of it at the time. He’d never heard of Steve Eisman.
But then he read about John Paulson, a hedge fund manager who had made $20 billion for his investors and nearly $4 billion for himself by betting against subprime mortgage bonds. This was more money than anyone had ever made so quickly on Wall Street. And he’d done it by betting against the same garbage that was destroying Citigroup and every other big bank.
Lewis has a perfect comparison here. He says Wall Street banks are like Las Vegas casinos. They set the odds. The customer might win from time to time, but never so spectacularly that they bankrupt the casino. But John Paulson had done exactly that. The casino had misjudged the odds of its own game. And at least one person had noticed.
So Lewis called Whitney again and asked: who else saw this coming? Who else had the brains to understand the system was broken and the nerve to actually bet on it?
She gave him a list. John Paulson was on it. But at the very top was Steve Eisman.
And that is how Michael Lewis got pulled back into writing about Wall Street. Not because of the corruption. Not because of the greed. But because a small handful of people had seen through the entire system when nobody else would. They saw that the biggest financial firms in the world were sitting on mountains of worthless mortgage bonds, and they had the courage to put their money where their mouths were.
Why This Prologue Matters
Lewis titled this prologue “Poltergeist” for a reason. A poltergeist is a ghost that moves things around, causes chaos, makes noises. You can’t see it, but you know it’s there. That was the subprime mortgage crisis before it blew up. It was already in the walls, already breaking things. And almost nobody could see it.
But a few people could. And that is what this book is about.
The prologue sets up the entire emotional framework of The Big Short. It’s not just about money or markets. It’s about a system that was supposed to be run by the smartest people in the room, and the discovery that those people were either ignorant or willfully blind. And the even more uncomfortable discovery that calling them stupid was more dangerous than calling them criminals.
Up next, we meet the first person who saw it all coming. A guy who reads financial statements for fun, has a glass eye, and was diagnosed with something that explains a lot about why he could see what others couldn’t.
Previous: The Big Short - Book Retelling Series Introduction